[TV] Steve Martin & Alec Baldwin To Host Oscars
Posted by Ashish on 11.04.2009
What do you think?
Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin are set to co-host the Oscars on March 7th. Martin has hosted the show before, in 2001 and 2003. Baldwin has never hosted before.
Anybody except Sacha Baron Cohen or Russell Brand is fine by me.
Posted By: Darren Runne (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Watching
Posted By: Bill (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 12:47 PM
yes
Posted By: chris (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 12:50 PM
I guess its the "SNL host club" bit
- whose next Hanks, Goodman,
Posted By: Guest#2081 (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 02:58 PM
the oscars by far is the biggest most important award show. yet it is the more boring to watch, regardless of host.
the problem isnt the host. the problem is every major blockbuster gets no recognition. then some film only four people saw gets 12 nominations.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 03:07 PM
the oscars by far is the biggest most important award show. yet it is the more boring to watch, regardless of host.
the problem isnt the host. the problem is every major blockbuster gets no recognition. then some film only four people saw gets 12 nominations.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 03:07 PM
Oh you mean like Titanic did in 1997 after being the highest grossing movie ever?
Posted By: Guest#8735 (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 03:21 PM
Guest#8735 that was over a decade ago.
I make an effort to see all the nominated films (which is going to be a bitch this year), but I can see how the general public that dosen't wouldn't care.
Posted By: Eddie G (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 03:38 PM
Ricky Gervais should be the host.....Where's the love for this comedic icon!!??
Posted By: Guest#4921 (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 04:15 PM
hilarity ensues....
Posted By: ICON (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 06:56 PM
the oscars by far is the biggest most important award show. yet it is the more boring to watch, regardless of host.
the problem isnt the host. the problem is every major blockbuster gets no recognition. then some film only four people saw gets 12 nominations.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 03:07 PM
Oh you mean like Titanic did in 1997 after being the highest grossing movie ever?
Posted By: Guest#8735 (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 03:21 PM
You mean like Lord of the Rings: Return of the King did in 2003?
Posted By: Guest#9349 (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 10:03 PM
Ricky Gervais should be the host.....Where's the love for this comedic icon!!??
Posted By: Guest#4921 (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 04:15 PM
now that i would watch
Posted By: Melissa (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 10:57 PM
Guest#8735 that was over a decade ago.
I make an effort to see all the nominated films (which is going to be a bitch this year), but I can see how the general public that dosen't wouldn't care.
Posted By: Eddie G (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 03:38 PM
Well I think that pretty much makes it the general public's fault for not seeing these movies. Slumdog Millionaire won best picture and people are like "waaaa i didn't even see that movie, who cares?? Dark Knight FOREVER!!"
First of all, I don't think Slumdog should have won, but ya know what...I SAW IT! And i live in fucking Kansas! If people want to complain about Transformers not getting nominated and some other movie they haven't seen winning, then maybe it would be there own damn fault for not watching something worthwhile.
Posted By: Erik (Guest) on November 04, 2009 at 11:02 PM
the oscars are still around? shit, they haven't been relevant since 1976.
Posted By: Darth Mortis (Guest) on November 05, 2009 at 01:18 PM
